Research
Low-resource MT, multilingual NLP, and model interpretability
With a focus on the languages and communities that current language technology serves worst. Full list also available on Google Scholar.
Publications
- 01WMT 2026 @ EMNLP
AmanaMT: Translation Direction Predicts Automatic Metric Reliability
Sole author
Benchmarked 10 MT evaluation metrics across 730,748 segments and 33 languages. Translation direction is the strongest predictor of metric–human agreement (η² = 0.31), far ahead of morphological type (η² = 0.07). Also identifies a Simpson's Paradox in multi-year evaluation.
- 02AmericasNLP 2026 @ ACL
Bringing Mapudungun into the Modern MT Ecosystem
First author
Fine-tuned NLLB-200 on Mapudungun–Spanish across eight tokenization strategies. A novel Morfessor-VC segmentation matches a 5× larger model on arn→es (43.2 vs. 42.9 chrF++).
Working Papers
- 01In preparation
Drawing Legs on a Snake: Handling Out-of-Vocabulary Characters in Pretrained Chinese MT
First author
Found that pretrained MT models can't represent many Chinese characters, and showed that a new embedding per missing character fixes names and ordinary words while radical-based decomposition never helps; proposed a dictionary-plus-pronunciation initialization for characters with no training data.
- 02In preparation
Span F1 Misreads Cross-Lingual Retrieval
First author
Multilingual needle-in-a-haystack tests score correct English answers as wrong. This artifact explains most of the non-Latin-script gap. It also manufactures cross-script transfer from fine-tuning and reshuffles MLQA rankings across 33 models in lm-evaluation-harness. We propose script-aware scoring as a drop-in fix.
- 03In preparation
Lost in Translation or Lost in the Model?
First author
Do multilingual LLMs flatten culturally untranslatable words, like Portuguese saudade, toward their English glosses? A matched-pair study of 105 untranslatable concepts across 28 languages and 7 models finds they don't. Untranslatables stay consistently farther from English than exact translations through the models' middle layers, and this holds after removing language-identity effects.
- 04In preparation
Donor or Seed? Separating Donor Effects from Training Noise in Low-Resource Translation
Co-author
Shows that comparing donor languages for low-resource NLLB fine-tuning on single runs mostly measures seed noise. A donor × seed variance decomposition across six targets finds donor effects are real but small, and similarity proxies fail to predict them.
- 05In preparation
Speech Registers for Multimodal MT
Co-author
Applies source-token registration (Qu et al. 2025) to improve zero-shot performance across all four {S,T}×{S,T} MT directions; benchmarks NLLB-200 (3.3B), fine-tuned NLLB (600M), and Whisper across 420 directions and 8 language pairs.